an inclination to analyze

a simple 'why' would have sufficed. what comes from a question meant to ask about something someone is purposely keeping from you? in light of all that, the simple question would have been 'why', not 'what'. if we can deduce or answer that 'why', then we do not need to know 'what', for 'what' then no longer becomes important.

however, notice must be taken that 'why' often is seen as invasive, for various reasons. we cannot ask 'why' often, therefore we must find out through clues and deduction. but then again, getting the wrong 'why' can mean all the difference in the world. so how do we ensure, that they 'why' we assume to be is the 'why' that is.

this will forever remain a source of problems, a source of negativity, a source of misunderstanding. a mismatch in 'why' is so critical, it can even spell life and death. but now, looking back, why do we want to know 'why'? what significance & what satisfaction does knowing 'why' brings us. why do we ask why? one then falls into the paradox of whys.

notice then that 'what' will never experience this same problem. this is why 'why' is so much more powerful than 'what' as a questioner. when 'why' is used intelligently, it can unravel new knowledge, new insights, new information.

use 'why' wisely, and you will know why.